|  
 |  
 
 
 
 
 
| 
 |  
 
  
My mom loves the Hallmark Hall of Fame movies—the 
ones they show on CBS on Sunday nights.  In fact, I think they’re pretty much the only 
movies she’ll watch.  I, on the other hand, have always stayed away from them, assuming 
them to be little more than worthless sap—but I made an exception for Brush with 
Fate.
  
But I had a good reason.
  
A couple of years ago, I 
accompanied my husband on a business trip to the Netherlands.  We spent a month in Delft, 
a beautiful old town famous for its pottery—as well as for its famous son, artist 
Johannes Vermeer.  While we were in Delft, the cameras arrived—along with trailers full 
of extras and costumes and horses.  We soon discovered that they were filming a 
made-for-TV movie based on Susan Vreeland’s book, Girl in Hyacinth Blue—a movie 
that would eventually a Hallmark Hall of Fame movie called Brush with Fate. 
 So of course, I had to see it.  I missed it on TV, so I was ecstatic to find it on 
DVD.
  
Glenn Close plays Cornelia Englebrecht, a quiet, anti-social prep 
school teacher who decides to reveal a long-kept family secret to Richard (Thomas 
Gibson), the school’s new art teacher.  She shows him a spectacular painting, which she 
tells him is “the lost Vermeer.”  Though she has no papers to prove the painting’s 
authenticity, she has plenty of stories.  She’s spent her life researching the history of 
the painting and of those who once owned it—and she tells their stories to Richard.  Each 
story tells of a person who loved the painting—who fought to keep it but eventually had 
to let it go.  She even tells the story of Magdalena, Vermeer’s daughter, the girl who 
modeled for the painting.  And finally, she tells her own story—the story of how her 
father came to own the painting.
  
While I haven’t read Girl in Hyacinth 
Blue yet, I’ve heard wonderful things about it.  I think, however, that while 
attempting to capture the story on film, the filmmakers ran into a few problems—and 
understandably so.  It’s difficult to condense 250 pages into 100 minutes—especially when 
those 250 pages are filled with several different stories.  Although those that were 
selected were interesting stories, they were all quite short, which made it difficult to 
really connect to any of the characters.  And when the closing credits rolled, I was 
still left with a number of unanswered questions—like why Cornelia would show Richard the 
painting and what she expected him to do about it.
  
At the same time, this 
is an impressive production for a made-for-TV movie.  It was shot on location, of course, 
and the scenery is spectacular.  And the story, despite its flaws, is enchanting.  If 
you’re an art enthusiast, you’ll be intrigued by the story of this one painting that 
touched the lives of so many different people through the centuries.  If you’re a 
sappy-drama kind of movie-lover, you’ll enjoy the stories of love and loss and commitment 
and responsibility.  For the rest of you, don’t expect an Oscar-worthy film, but don’t 
let the Hallmark Hall of Fame stamp scare you away, either.  You might just like 
it.
  
 
 |   
 |    
 |  
  
 |